The Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed an interim application seeking withdrawal of a main special appeal as the dispute was amicably settled, resulting in a withdrawal of the main appeal and pending appeals.
The interim application was allowed; the main Special Appeal SA No. 29A/2022 and other pending I.A.s were disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-3,Kolkata Order Sheet (Continuation)
Smt. Nila RoY & &Anr'
Smt. Nila RoY & & Anr'
No, SA/29A/2022
ab National Bank
Date of Order order with signature
order No.15 Present:
pr.21.05.2025
Sl.No.28 For Applicant : Ld. Counsel R, D. Baqchi
For Defendant : Ld. Counsel S. Roy on behalf of D Chakrabarti
At2OSAlzs is taken uP for hearing.
lleard Ld. counsels for both sides.
Considered.
Ld. Counsel for the SA Applicant filed I.A. No 2058 of 2025
praying for withdrawal of the main S.A The apPlication is
5S supported by Affidavit of the applicant lvlrs Dipankar Roy
Durang the pendency of the S A. the matter has been settled
with the Respondent Bank and the Respondent Bank i5 not
going to continue with the instant proceedanq and has issued a
'No Dues Certificate'. Since this ls an amicable settlement
between the partres and the Applicant intends to withdraw the
main 5.A., no preJudice will be caused if the I A is allowed'
Accordingly, the instant I A is allowed and stands disposed of
as withdrawn and settled amicably. I A. 2059 of 2025 being the
put up petition is also disposed of
S.A. No. 298 of 2022 along with all other pending l A s, if any,
is disposed of as withdrawn,
Flle be consigned to Record Room after observing all formalities'
V
( Kamal De )
Presiding Officer
DRT-3, Kolkata
Smt. Nila Roy & Anr
National Bank
D Chakrabarti
Kamal De
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
