The DRT Lok Adalat adjudicated an application contesting bank recovery action. Finding the underlying dispute settled via a submission memo filed by the Respondent Bank, the Adalat closed the application as infructuous.
SA.No.293/2025 dismissed as infructuous; liberty granted to file fresh SA if need arises in future.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOKADALAT
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERYTRIBUNAL.I AT HYDERABAD
DATED THIS THE I 3TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025
PRESENTi
s.A.No.293,/2O2b
Smt K. Bhavani @ Bhavani Kedasu,
... Applicant
Versus
Union Bank of India, Gadwal - II branch, Jogulamba Gadwal district. Rep. by its Authorised offlcer
... Respondent
Reference made by:-
Applicant Respondent Bank
Smt Jyothi Rani Dharmi Ms. Sangeeta Jaiswal
Received Date: 28.10.2025
-:AWARD:-
09.2025 filed by the Respondent Bank sum of Rs.3,07,880/- and respondent nt. Accordingly, SA.No.293/2025 is
W--C
closed as infructuous with a liberty to the Applicant to file fresh SA if there is any need in future. In view of the said memo filed by the Respondent, the SA.No.293/2025 is dismissed as infructuous.
(Given under the hand and seal of the Lok Adalat Bench on this the 13th day of Sept, 2025)
sd/-
sd/-
sd/-
(Avss PRASADI (K. NANDINI REDDY ) Member Member
(GUMMADT cOPr CHANDI PO /Judicial Member
f'ffi
i; 2oorrm ;
t**,r9
AseL6glstrar
^^r.t.HVDERAAAO,
Smt K. Bhavani @ Bhavani Kedasu
Union Bank of India
Gummadigopichand
A.V.S.S. Prasad
K. Nandini Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
