Dismissed
Surapaneni Sarath Kumar v. Union Bank of India
DRTSA/292/2024
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
the Securitization Application No. 292/2024 was closed as not pressed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE LOKADALAT DEBTS RECOYERY TRIBUNAL II HYDERABAI)
AWARD
DATED: 08.03.2025
IN
SECURITIZATTON APPLICATION NO 292t2024
Present:-
Reference made by Applicant through: Respondent through:
Sri B. Sreenivasa Reddy, Advocate. trr7s. Dlumani & Co.
Between:_
Venkata Ramana Rao.
Union Bank oflndia
And
Respondent.
*:
ffi:t*'
sA.29212024
OTS. Learned counselfor the Applicantprays that the SA may be closed as notpressed. Learned coUnsel for the respondent present'
(GivenunderthehandandsealoftheLokAdalatBenchonthisthe 8ft daYof March, 2025)
T.SridKarRe Member
*&#',ffi Member
Venkata Ramana Rao
Union Bank of India
Rameshwar Kothe
T. Sridhar Reddy
P. Suseela
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court