This order records the withdrawal of an auction sale possession scheduled for 19.06.2025 due to a pending NCLT petition, resulting in the disposal of the current summons appeal as infructuous.
Possession scheduled for 19.06.2025 deferred; S.A. No.290 of 2025 and I.A. No.1386 of 2025 disposed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 18.06.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.290 of 2025 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr Rajeev Singh i/b Ms Bhakti C. Jogal, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr Atul Gupta, Advocate for Respondent No.1. |
|||
| 10 | Mr Ashwin Ranjana, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 & 3. Service affidavit (exhibit-10) filed by Ld. Advocate for the Applicant. Heard on I.A. No.1386 of 2025. During the course of arguments, Ld. Advocate for Respondent No.1 states that the possession scheduled on 19.06.2025 i.e., tomorrow is deferred in view of the petition u/s. 95 filed by the Applicant before the Hon’ble NCLT. Statement made by the Ld. Advocate for Respondent No.1 is accepted and shall act as an order of this Tribunal. In view of above, parties agree to dispose of I.A. as well as the S.A as infructuous. Accordingly, I.A. No.1386 of 2025 and S.A. No.290 of 2025 stands disposed of as infructuous. |
||
| rst - 03 | File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Applicant
Respondent No.1
Respondent Nos.2 & 3
P.O.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
