Allowed

Mr Swapan Kumar Polley and Ors. v. Union Bank of India

DRT1 Apr 2025SA/289/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed an interim application for withdrawal of the main application following an amicable settlement between the applicants and the respondent bank, disposing of the main application as settled and withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

The instant interim application was allowed and disposed of being dismissed as withdrawn; the main application was disposed of as withdrawn.

Mr Swapan Kumar Polley and Ors. versus Union Bank of… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | DRT (2025)

¶1

Debts Recovery Tribunal-3, Kolkata Order Sheet (Continuation )

¶2

CaseNo.SA/2	a9l2O23 Mr.Swapan Kumar Poll€y &Ors.vs. UnitedBankofIndia& Anr.
Date of Order	Ord€rwithsignature
OrderNo,08 Dt,01.04.2025 Sl.No.13	Present: ForApplicant:Ld. CounselMr. B.C.Ivonal ForDefendant:None
sh	1N7133/2O25istaken upforhearing, Heard Ld.counselforSARFAESIapplicants. Considered. Noneappearsfrom thesideoftherespondentbank.
	Ld CounselfortheApplicantfiledLA.No.1133of2025 prayingforwithdrawalofthemain S.A. Theapplicationis supportedbyAffidavitoftheapplicantMr.SwapanKumar Polley.Duringthe^pendencyoftheS.A.thematter hasbeen settledwith theRespondent BankandtheRespondent Bankis notgoingtocontinuewith theinstantproceeding. Sincethisis anamicablesettlementbetweenthepartiesandtheApplicant antendsto wlthdraw themain S.A., no prejudicewillbecausedif the I.A. isallowedwithoutinvitingresponsefrom otherside. Accordingly,theinstantLA,is allowed and standsdisposedof being dismissedaswlthdrawnassettled amicably. S.A.No.289of2023 alongwith all otherpendingI.A.s, if any,isdisposed ofaswlthdrawn. FilebeconsignedtoRecord Roomafterobservingall formalities.
	(XamatOe) PresidingOfficer DRT-3, Kolkata

¶3

Debts Recovery Tribunal-III, Kolkata

¶4

Order Sheet (Continuation)

¶5

Mr. Swapan Kumar Polley & Ors.

¶6

¶7

Case No.^sA/2A9/2023 Union Bank of India & Anr.

¶8

Office action
Date
dated
of
Order with signature signature of
Order
)t 01 o4.2025 Later:
It appears that the name of the Defendant Bank will be "Union
Bank of India" in place of "United Bank of tndia" in Order No. 4
dated 0tl04/2025.
Order No. 4 dated OU04|2O25 is modified in respect of the name
only; the rest portion of the Order remains unaltered.
lrimatDE)--
Presiding Offlcer
DRT-3, Kolkata

Mr Swapan Kumar Polley and Ors. v. Union Bank of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr Swapan Kumar Polley and Ors. v. Union Bank of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Subhranil Sarkar versus Bank of Maharashtra

Subhash Kumar Tiwari versus State Bank of India

Ruchika Dhanuka and Anr. versus Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. and Anr.

Aniruddha Mukherjee and Anr. versus the Authorized Officer of Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd.

Abdul Jabbar and Ors. versus Adity Birla Housing Finance Ltd. and Ors.

Canara Bank versus Ms Jhuma Saha