Diwakar Kumar v. Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
An application before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Patna was dismissed for non-prosecution as the applicant was absent and no steps were taken to proceed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| Date of order or proceeding |
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, PATNA Order with the Signature of the Court |
Office action taken with date |
|---|---|---|
| SA 289 of 2023 | ||
| 15.07.2025 | Patna (KaUSh~ Yadav) Presiding Officer As none is present for the applicant. It has been reported by the Registrar that none has appeared for taking steps. In such circumstances, the present SA is dismissed for non- prosecution. Order be uploaded on the Tribunal's website. |
Applicant
Kaushik Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court