Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the special application as infructuous because the underlying account dispute between the parties had been settled, rendering the applicant's case moot.
Special application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, PATNA | ||
|---|---|---|
| Date of order or proceeding |
Orderwith the Signature of the Court |
Office action taken with date |
| SA 288 of 2024 | ||
| 28.07.2025 | vCo/~~ (Kaushalendra Yadav) Presiding Officer None is present for the applicant. Ld. counsel for the respondent bank is present and has submitted that the account in question has been settled between the parties hence it appears that the applicant has lost its interest in the case. In such circumstances, the present SA is dismissed being infructuous. Interim order, if any stands vacated. File be consigned to record room. Order be uploaded on the Tribunal's website. Patna |
The Applicant
Respondent Bank
Kaushalendra Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
