Debts Recovery Tribunal-II, Delhi dismissed Special Appeal in default due to non-appearance of the applicant on multiple hearing dates, including today, concluding the applicant is not interested in pursuing the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sAl287l2O23 RAMA NANDA VS PUNJAB NATIONALBANK
20.tL.2025
Item no.38
Present None for applicant Mr. Sunav Rastogi, Counselfor respondent bank
Matter is taken throughVideo Conferencing/ Hybrid Mode.
None appeared on behalf ofthe applicant on 09.01.2025, 16.04.2025 and 11.08.2025.None appeared today. It appears that the applicants arenot interestedin pursuing the case. Hence, thepresent SA isdismissed in default for non- prosecution.
File be consigned torecords.
9r)
(susHIL KUIqAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
Rama Nanda
Punjab National Bank
Susheel Kumar Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
