Ms a and C Ventures v. State Bank of India
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SA/283/2024
Both the counsels are present. In view of the fact that, despite the extension of the interim order on 09.04.2025, it is recorded that the actual possession of the property is taken. The Authorised officer is directed to appear in person and file an Affidavit how the possession is taken, despite the interim order passed by this Tribunal. Post on 14.05.2025.
The Authorised officer of the respondent to file an Affidavit as to how the actual possession was taken, despite, extension of the interim order on 09.04.2025.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · P.o
- Order 2 · P.o
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court