Mandeepinder Singh v. Indian Overseas Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The applicant's settlement application was disposed of because the respondent bank stated the account had been settled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/270/2023 MANDEEPINDER SINGH Vs INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK
23.07.2025 Item No.24
Present: Ms. Parmeet Kaur, Counsel for the Applicant. Ms. Seerat Sharma, proxy Counsel for Mr. Pankaj Beri, Counsel for respondent bank.
Counsel for the respondent bank states that account has since been settled. In view of this, SA stands disposed of.
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
MANDEEPINDER SINGH
INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court