Sh. Jarnail Singh Chopra v. Cholamandalam Investment
Case brief
What is this about?
This order dismisses the applicant's petition for non-prosecution due to failure to appear after issuance of a default notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sAl27l2O24
SH. JARNAIL SINGH CHOPRA VS CHOI.AMANDALAM INVESTMENT
24.07.2025
Item no. 27
Present None for applicant. Shri Vivek Kumar, counsel forrespondent FI.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencing/Hybrid Mode.
Despite issuance of the defaultnotice, no one appeared on behalf of the applicant. Itappears that the applicant is not interested inpursuing thecase. Hence,the present SA is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
File be consigned to records.
€), (SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
P
SH. JARNAIL SINGH CHOPRA
CHOI.AMANDALAM INVESTMENT
SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court