In default of appearance by the applicant despite notice, this Debt Recovery Tribunal held that the applicants were not interested in pursuing the case and dismissed the special appeal in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribuna!-Il, Delhi
sAl26el2022 USHA SUBHASH Vs PNB HOUSING FINANCE LTD
", 25.04.2025
Item no. 40
Present None for applicant. Mr. Ravinder Singh, counsel for respondent FI.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencing/ hybrid Mode.
The Ld. Counsel for respondent FI has appeared today before this Tribunal.
Despite issuance of default notice, no one appeared on behalf of the applicant. It appears that the applicants are not interested in pursuing the case. Hence, the present SA is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
File be consigned to records.
T
(susHIL KUMnx xASTOCI; PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
A
Usha Subhash
PNB Housing Finance Ltd
Sushil Kumar Kasturi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
