The action proceeding before the EBTS Recovery Tribunal was disposed of as infructuous. The respondent bank's application for an in-prima facie hearing was withdrawn, leading to this disposition.
The application for in-prima facie hearing (I.A.268/23) was disposed of as infructuous due to non-appearance of the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
'EBTS RECOVERY TRIB IAL LUCKNOW
a fice action proceeding =en with daI e S.A. No.268/2023 Ident 02.09.2025 BH of Ld. Counsel for thb respc SL. No.64 bank Shri S. S. Rajawat is pres4nt. It is submitted that the I.A. No.2, 100 of 2023 has been filed by the res$onden bank stating therein that the bank hbs witt Irawn ;AESI notice under Section 13(4) of tHe SAR on Act, 2002 and has issued notil 22.08.2023 and possession no+ce chi llenge in this case has already withdrabn. None appears for the appjicnat. le SA I In view of the fact, accordingly, is disposed off as infructuous. Let the file consigned to r+cord rc Im. Order be uploaded on the Tril lnal’s website. ( dictate (Prava4 Kum46inbh) Presiding Of$cer Mugjsh
Applicant
Respondent Bank
Pravay Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
