Paramjeet Singh v. Au Small Finance Bank Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
In the absence of the applicant, who showed no interest in pursuing SA/262/2024, the Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the default application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/262/2024 PARAMJEET SINGH Vs AU SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED
17.12.2025 Item No.41
Present: None for the Applicant. Ms. Deepika Mittal, Counsel for respondent No.1/bank. None for respondent No.2.
This is third pass over. Nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 01:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application should be dismissed due to the applicant's absence.
Paramjeet Singh
AU Small Finance Bank Limited
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court