The Debts Recovery Tribunal-II, Delhi dismissed Special Appeal SA/261/2023 in default for non-prosecution as the applicant failed to appear despite a default notice.
Special Appeal dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sAl2612023 MR RAMSA,IVAN YADAV VS IIFL HOME FINANCE LIMITED
20.0L.202s
Item no. 36
Present None for applicant. Ms. Ekta Kundu, counsel for respondent FI.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencing/Hybrid Mode.
The Ld. Counsel for respondent FI hasappeared today before this Tribunal.
Despite issuance of default notice,no one appeared on behalf of the applicant. Itappearsthat the applicants are not interestedin pursuingthe case. Hence, thepresent SA isdismissed in default for non-prosecution.
File be consigned to records.
c' /
(SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
P
MR. RAMSA, IVAN YADAV
IIFL HOME FINANCE LIMITED
SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
