Application for securitisation was dismissed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal in Aurangabad for want of prosecution, as the applicant failed to appear or show interest in pursuing the matter.
The Securitisation Application No. 257/2024 stands dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 20.08. Sr. No |
2025 .34 SA No. 257/2024 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Classifi cation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITISATION APPLICTION NO. 257/2024. | ||
| Chandrashekhar Narayan Venkatraman. ..Applicant Versus State Bank of India and Ors. ..Respondents None for the applicant Mr. Jethliya Dhiraj R. - Advocate for respondent Bank. 1. In this matter, nobody is appearing to conduct the proceeding for applicant. 2. Today, none appeared for the applicant. It appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order. ORDER A. The Securitisation Application No. 257/2024 stands dismissed in default for non-prosecution. |
||
| B. Pending IA’s in the proceeding, if any, are disposed of accordingly. The interim Stay, if any also stands vacated. |
||
| C. File be consigned to the record room. (Dr. J.R. Chauhan) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[Ambadas] (SA No. 257/2024) Page 1 of 1
Chandrashekhar Narayan Venkatraman
State Bank of India
Dr. J.R. Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
