Devendra Kumar Rai v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition challenging disqualification from service due to outstanding tax challan. Court framed issues regarding legality of disqualification, liability of authorities to reinstate petitioner, and maintainability of writ jurisdiction.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONTD. ORDER. SHEET
PAGE NO
CASE NO
| JATE | w..225/ | DESCRIPTION OFTHEORDER 2022 |
REMARK |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03.09.20 | 6 dql l( qrnE-6 sqq orgrn o-{rfr qri r |
3il-iffiqeTdft\fr3Terf, olTlcr-d erfuq-fiTI sm{qrfrt-6dfrrfrqg<Xwl efi-+mit ffi ddTdftr*gfiq"-i-tr orBq-mt 3rtq lcDwl3iftq3ilteTtgft'{dt t y.rdt3tfrq3ilttTfuqrqrrqt 3rftq 3rtrTqrftofu-qrrqlt ilql3$l( ffivqnsq\frilfiro-{ q&Tgr<trr{Sdqt+.{qqrFraqr6-t r$fi-Rfu-qrsr-oqo-F-s6T-44d 3IRqoilterqrRofrqtrqt 3rriYr@tq-frg.rqqef6<sup>gqacl qdI qRqqcde\t oTFrd-s3lmsr'ttsfrgvlfrovw ffiqorffi, S.enq.0.q.q.,'qEffi$rrd |
1
gfl. q. iqt -zss/zozz
xqqT{fr Grkm-{'Tq"rdg{
(u' u lti u-dwg vw)
(ffiq 3rffi - flTftq +ft nq F-qR{tr}d)
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's disqualification from the service was lawful under the levied challan and correspondence.
Whether the respondent authorities were liable to be directed to reinstate the petitioner in service.
Whether the impugned order of disqualification is maintainable in writ jurisdiction.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sorqrfr
- respondent
vFT, /H{;
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court