The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed an application filed by Balwinder Kaur in default proceedings. The applicant failed to appear despite repeated calls and was deemed uninterested in pursuing the case.
The application was dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovely Tribunal-Il, Delhi
s[l2s4l2023 BALVINDER KAUR THROUGH LRS JASPAL SINGH Vs I(ARW FINANCIAL SERVICE LTD
29.07.2025
Item no. 34
Present None for applicant. Shri Harshit Singh, counsel for respondent FI.
Matter is taken through Video ConferencinglHybrid Mode.
On perusal of the file, it is observed thatnone appeared on behalf of applicants on29.0t.2025. Despite repeated calls, today alsonone appearedon behalf of the applicants. It appearsthat the applicants are not interested inpursuing thecase. Hence, the present SA is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
File be consigned to records.
t) (SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFRCER DRT-II, Delhi
P
Balwinder Kaur Through LRS
F.I. Financial Service Ltd
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
