Kamal Kishore Solanki v. PNB Housing Finance Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
An application was dismissed in default because the applicant did not appear before the Debts Recovery Tribunal despite notice. No adjudication on merits was made.
An application was dismissed in default because the applicant did not appear before the Debts Recovery Tribunal despite notice. No adjudication on merits was made.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 36
Case No. SA/252/2024
KAMAL KISHORE SOLANKI Vs PNB HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED
Date: 06.02.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
None for the applicant
Shri Piyush Khandelwal, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Despite Passover, none appears on behalf of applicant.
Accordingly, SA stands disposed of as dismissed in default, all pending IAs also stands disposed off, if any.
Copy of the order be given free to the concerned parties.
File be consigned to record as per rules.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
cm
KAMAL KISHORE SOLANKI
PNB HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court