Sunil Rampal Yadav v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. Through its Authorized Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
In SA No.251 of 2025, the DRT-II accepted an undertaking by the applicant to deposit secured amounts. The scheduled possession was deferred. The interlocutory application for stay and the saint were disposed of.
What did the court decide?
Possession deferred; I.A. No.1190 of 2025 and S.A. No.251 of 2025 disposed of.