Special Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear and did not provide instructions to counsel.
Special Appeal No.246 of 2023 dismissed for want of prosecution; file consigned to Record Room.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 21.03.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.246 of 2023 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| None for the Applicant. Ms Aparna Jagtap i/b Mrs Uma S. Fadia, Advocate for Respondent. |
|||
| nrb - 26 | Order-sheet dated 17.10.2024 passed by the learned Registrar shows that Counsel for the Applicant is not getting any instructions from the Applicant and has failed to file service affidavit proving service upon the Respondents. Today, no representation is made by the Applicant either personally or through the Advocate. It appears that the Applicant is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, S.A. No.246 of 2023 stands dismissed for want of prosecution. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Applicant
Respondent
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
