The Debt Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur disposed of the Section 34 application as infructuous due to the closure of the respondent account, along with any pending interim applications.
Section 34 application and all pending interim applications disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 19
Case No.SA/237/2025
ADITYA NAG Vs AUTHUM INVESTMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE LTD
Date: 18.07.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
None for the Applicant
Shri Hemant Kumar, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
In this matter, Counsel for the Respondent submits that the account has been closed and SA may be disposed of as infractuous.
Considering the submission made by Counsel for the Respondent, SA stands disposed off as infractuous, all pending IAs also stands disposed off, if any.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Aditya Nag
Authum Investment and Infrastructure Ltd
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
