The statutory appeal was disposed of as the respondent bank's demand and possession notices were withdrawn by affidavit, rendering the appeal infructuous.
The statutory appeal (SA/235/2023) is disposed of as the impugned notices were withdrawn by the Respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL 1, KOLKATA
Order Sheet (continuation)
| Case No.SA- | 235-2023 MANOJ KUMAR BAJORIA Vs OMKARA ASSETS RECONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIM |
ITED |
|---|---|---|
| Date of the Order |
Order with Signature | Office action with date and dated Signature of Parties when necessary |
| 08/07/202 | None appears for Sarfaesi Applicant. | |
| 5 | Ld. Counsel Ms. Shreya Bhatia appears for Respondent ARC. |
|
| Ld. Counsel for Respondent ARC has filed an affidavit withdrawing the demand notice and possession notice. Besides, ld. Counsel for Respondent ARC submits that the Applicant has filed two another applications before ld. DRT – 3, Kolkata challenging the fresh demand notice and possession notice. In view of the withdrawl of demand notice and possession notice, SA/235/2023 becomes infructuous. Hence, SA/235/2023 is disposed of as demand notice and possession notice were withdrawn by Respondent ARC. |
||
| (Ambuja Mohan Das) Presiding Officer |
(Sne)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
MANOJ KUMAR BAJORIA
OMKARA ASSETS RECONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED
Ambuja Mohan Das
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
