The applicant sought withdrawal of the Second Appeal as the dispute was settled between the parties. The Presiding Officer allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the appeal as withdrawn.
Application for withdrawal allowed; Second Appeal disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 31
Case No.SA/231/2023
MS PUSHPA SALES Vs KARNATAKA BANK LIMITED
Date: 13.08.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
Shri Akarsh Mathur, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Vikram Dagur, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Ld. Counsel for the applicant wants to withdraw this SA, as the matter has been settled between the parties.
Request is allowed.
As the matter has been settled between the parties, therefore SA stands disposed of as withdrawn.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
MS PUSHPA SALES
KARNATAKA BANK LIMITED
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
