Jarnail Singh v. Utkarsh Small Finance Bank
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
,i
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sA/23O 12024 JARNAIL SINGH Vs UTI(ARSH SMALL FINANCE BANK
25.04.2025
Item no. 39
Present: None for applicant.
Mr. Sandeep Soni, counsel for respondent FI
Matter is taken through Video Conferencingl hybrid Mode.
The Ld. Counsel for respondent FI has appeared today before this Tribunal.
Despite issuance of default notice, no one appeared on behalf of the applicant. It appears that the applicants are not interested in pursuing the case. Hence, the present SA is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
File be consigned to records.
sA (SUSHIL KUMAR. r) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
Parties & counsel
- applicant
JARNAIL SINGH
- respondent
UTI (ARSH SMALL FINANCE BANK)
Coram
SUSHIL KUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court