In default proceedings, where the applicant failed to appear despite the case being called repeatedly, the Debt Recovery Tribunal dismissed the application as no proceeding was pursued.
Application dismissed in default due to non-appearance of the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/23/2025
SH HEM CHAND Vs JOGINDRA CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD
24.04.2025 Item No.16
Present: None for the Applicant.
Mr. Anil Sharma, Counsel for respondent bank.
Mr. Sharma, states that he has filed reply to the SA and also supplied the copy of same to the opposite party. Case called several times since morning but nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 01:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
SH HEM CHAND
JOGINDRA CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
