This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 07.02.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.227 of 2022 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| None for the Applicant. Mr Shreesh Oak, Advocate for Respondent. |
|||
| nrb - 48 | Case called out but there is no response from either of the parties. It is apparent from the record that since 04.04.2024, the Applicant remained absent in the matter. It appears from the conduct of the Applicant that he is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, S.A. No.227 of 2022 stands dismissed for want of prosecution. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Applicant
Respondent
P.O.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
