Matter settled by applicant; proceedings withdrawn. Court directed respondent bank to restore possession of property upon receipt of pending EMI.
Bank directed to restore possession after receiving the EMI.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts RecovelYTribunal-Il,Delhi
sAl22sl2o2s BINAY CHANDBANTHIAVS ICICI BANK LIMITED
2t.08.2025
Item no. 05
Present Shri KaishKhan,counsel for applicant. Shri Rachit Bigghe,counsel for respondent bank.
Matter is takenthrough video conferen cinglHybrid Mode.
The Ld. Counselfor the applicanthas submittedthat he has made theentire payment with respondentbank and the matterhas been settled. Therefore,he may be permitted to withdrawthe presentSA'
on the otherhand, the Ld. counsel for the respondent bank hassubmitted that the applicant has paid the entire dues andEMI of the present monthis due and he has takenpaft possession of the propefi' Itis submitted thatbank will restore the possession to the applicant onpayment of the EMI as the matterhas been settled. Therefore,the SA is dismissed as withdrawnand respondentbank is directed to restore the possession after receivingthe EMI.
File be consignedto records.
(susHIL rurqMdsrocl) PRESIDINGOFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
P
Binay Chand Banthia
ICICI Bank Limited
Sushil Kumar
DRT-II Delhi Presiding Officer
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
