The Applicant failed to appear while the Respondent Bank stated the Applicant did not comply with a prior order. The Special Application was dismissed.
Special Application dismissed for non-appearance of applicant and non-compliance with prior order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/22/2024 MS MAHADEV SAW MILLS Vs PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
06.11.2025 Item No.1
Present: None for the Applicant. Sh.JS Bagga, Counsel for the respondent bank.
Mr.Bagga has placed on the record a copy of letter, dated 21.03.2025 stating that earlier there was an OTS. However, applicant did not comply with the same. Nobody has put in appearance on behalf of the applicant today. Accordingly, the present SA is hereby dismissed .
File be consigned to the record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
MS MAHADEV SAW MILLS
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
