No one appeared for the applicants on the second calling of the matter, despite prior absence on the previous date. The court dismissed the interaction for lack of interest by the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ORDER SHEET
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, SILIGURI
IA Case No. 658/2024 in SA/211/2024
Sri Chotey Lal Prasad & Anr Applicant Vs State Bank of India Defendants Office action with date and Date of Order with Signature dated Order signature of parties when necessary.
Item No.20 10.12.2025
Order No.07
Present:
Counsel for the applicants : None.
Counsel for the respondent : Mr. Rajneesh Tripathi.
No one appears for the applicant.
List this matter for second call.
~------
(RAKESH PATI TIWARI) Presiding Officer DRT-Siliguri
Later on:
Matter is again called out for second time but no one appears for the applicants as well and on previous date of hearing also no one had participated in the hearing for the applicant and as such it seems that the applicant has got no interest in the matter and
accordingly, dismissed.
Let the file be consigned to the Record Room.
Order be uploaded in the website of the Tribunal.
(RAK PATI TIWARI) Presiding Officer DRT-Siliguri
Sri Chotey Lal Prasad & Anr
State Bank of India
Rakesh Pati Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
