and 13(4) of the SARFA ott' Respondent bank filed photostat copies of o"n'tt' possession notice dated ,r.l1T^^nn"dated 03.08'2021. publication of possession notice in Hans India ,roto^'1'1' tuntn' dailies on 37'7o.2o2r, affixture oF possession noa,] vide m a teria r ru * ", l, ;";":::1 ;:TIJ::: T :[ ill; statement. As the applicants noticesunder'ARFAEsr^;,;'.J,r"::,"J:::ff,":,i"T j"",.:# u/s 14 in Ctl.M.p.7g ot 2022 uno the Advocate commissioner appointed therein issued u n, 07.o6.2o2z.rhereafter,,r" ;;:i:"t:ilf,J:: lillJ.:; the possession of the SA schedule_l property and handed over the same to the respondent bank on t4.O6.2022. In fact, applicants approached the respondent bank vide letter dated 74.06.2022 for re-delivery of the property. As the schedule_2 property remains with the applicants, respondent bank got the time for execution of Warrant extended. Applicants proposed to to clear the outstanding dues in nine months @Rs.g,O0,OOO/_ up to March, Z0Z3 by a letter dated 20.06.2022. However, applicants sought further time by a letter dated 16.01.2023. Respondent bank directed the applicants to clear the dues by 27.02.2023, else face further proceedings. However, despite seeking time vide letter dated 27.02,2023 applicants failed to discharge the liability. The present SA is filed cha enging the Advocate Commissioner,s second notice dated 24.04.2023.
