The application was dismissed in default because the applicant failed to appear in person or through counsel on the third listing despite multiple recalls.
Application dismissed in default due to non-appearance of the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/1/2025 MS KISHORILAL GURDIAL CHAND Vs CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA
24.01.2025 Item No.16
Present: None for the Applicant.
Sh. Vivek Verma, Counsel for respondent bank.
This is third pass over. Case called several times since morning but nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 03:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
MS KISHORILAL GURDIAL CHAND
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA
(A S Narang)
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
