Ms a K Bhadhan v. Uco Bank
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/4/2025 MS A K BHADHAN Vs UCO BANK
10.02.2025 Item No.3
Present: None for the Applicant. Sh.RK Jindal, Counsel for the respondent bank.
Mr.Jindal states that applicant has not complied with the order dated 16.01.2025. This is third pass over. Case called several times since morning but nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 03:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Parties & counsel
- applicant
MS A K BHADHAN
- respondent
UCO BANK
Coram
S Narang
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court