The Applicant failed to appear in person or through counsel. The Presiding Officer observed that the applicant is not interested in pursuing the case and hence dismissed the Special Appeal in default.
The Special Appeal was dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts RecovelYTribunal-Il,Delhi
sAlL92l2O2s RAM JEEVANSHARMA VS EDELWEISS ASSET RECONSTRUCTIONCOMPANYLIMITED
18.09.202s
Item no. 06
Present: None
Matter is takenthrough Video conferencingl Hybrid Mode.
on perusal of thefile it is observedthat none appeared onbehalf of applicant on 0t'07 '2025' Today also noneappeared on behalf of the applicant. Itappearsthat the applicant is not interested inpursuing the case. Hence, the present SA is dismissedin default for non-prosecution'
File be consignedto records.
tb. (SUSHIL KUMAf,. RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
P
RAM JEEVAN SHARMA
EDELWEISS ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED
SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
