In a securitisation application under DRT, the Debts Recovery Tribunal disposed of the application as withdrawn after the parties reached a full and final settlement without sacrifice on 18/06/2025.
The SA No. 188 /2025 stands disposed of as withdrawn. Pending Interlocutory Applications stands disposed off.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 29.07. Sr. No |
2025 .26 SA No. 188/2025 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Classifi cation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITISATIONS APPLICATION NO. 188/2025. Samarth Traders Through its Prop. Ashok Dadarao Waghmare ..Applicant Versus Maharashtra Gramin Bank and Ors ..Respondent Mr. Ambadas Sopanrao Jadhav -Advocate for the applicant Mr. Kalyankar J.R. -Advocate for the respondents. 1. The learned counsel for Applicant has submitted that the loan account was settled for a total Rs. 5,47,967/- without any sacrifice, as a full and final settlement. The entire amount was re paid and the loan account was closed on 18/06/2025. The counsel for respondents has also filed pursis in support of submissions made by counsel for the applicant. Therefore, the applicant wants to withdraw the Securitization application No. 188 of 2015. 2. Heard. 3. In view of the full and final settlement between the parties under OTS, I pass the following order. ORDER A. The S.A. No. 188 /2025 stands disposed of as withdrawn. B. Pending Interlocutory Applications, if any stands disposed off. C. Consign the file to the Record Room. (Dr. J.R. Chauhan) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[Ambadas] (SA No.188/2025) Page 1 of 1
Samarth Traders Through its Prop. Ashok Dadarao Waghmare
Maharashtra Gramin Bank and Ors
Dr. J.R. Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
