Savita Rani v. Jana Small Finance Bank Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Tribunal-II, Delhi dismissed the application for default due to non-appearance and lack of interest by the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il,Delhi
sA/18s 12024 SAVTTA RANIVS JANA SMALLFINANCE BANK LTD
29.09.2025
Item no.26
Present: Nonefor aPPlicant Ms. Ojasvi Sharma,Counsel for respondent bank
Matter is takenthrough Video Conferencing/ Hybrid Mode.
None appearedon behalf of the applicant. None appeared today' It appears thatthe applicantsare not interested in pursuing the ..t.. Hence,the present SA is dismissed in default for non- prosecution.
File be consignedto records.
cI-
(SUSHIL KUMARRASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
SAVTTA RANI
JANA SMALLFINANCE BANK LTD
SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court