Bharti v. iifl home fin Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
This order dismisses an application in default for non-prosecution after the applicant failed to appear despite a default notice.
What the court decided
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sA/182 12024 BHARTI Vs IIFL HOME FIN LTD
25.04.2025
Item no. 33
Present: None for applicant.
Mr. Inderjeet Sisodia, counsel for respondent FI.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencingl hybrid Mode.
The Ld. Counsel for respondent FI has appeared today before this Tribunal.
Despite issuance of default notice, no one appeared on behalf of the applicant. It appears that the applicants are not interested in pursuing the case. Hence, the present SA is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
File be consigned to records.
4 < e\
(SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Bharti
- respondent
IIFL Home Fin Ltd
Coram
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court