In a debt recovery matter, the Tribunal dismissed the application in default for non-prosecution as the applicant failed to appear despite repeated calls.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sA/181 12024 ARTI SHARMA Vs INDIA BULLS HOUSING FINANCE LTD
t7.09.2025
Item no.44
Present None for applicant.
Ms. Gargi Mukhopadhyay, counsel for respondent FI.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencingl hybrid Mode.
The Ld. Counsel for respondent FI has appeared today before this Tribunal.
Despite repeated calls, no one appeared on behalf of the applicant. It appears that the applicants are not interested in pursuing the case. Hence, the present SA is dismissed in default for nonprosecution.
File be consigned to records.
A
Arti Sharma
India Bulls Housing Finance Ltd
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
