Security Company Ltd. has not appeared for securitization application No. 18/2025, leading to dismissal.
Securitization Application No. 18/2025 stands dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
08.09.2025
Sr. No.25 SA No. 18/2025
SECURITIZATION APPLICATION NO. 18/2025.
Sunita Kailas Shelke and four Ors. ..Applicants
Versus
Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd., ..Respondent
None for the applicants, and respondent.
1. In this matter, nobody is appearing to conduct the
proceeding for applicants.
2. Today, none appeared for the applicants. It appears that the
applicants are not interested in prosecuting the matter.
3. In view of the above, I pass the following order.
ORDER
A. The Securitization Application No. 18/2025 stands
dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
B. Pending IA’s in the proceeding, if any, are disposed of
accordingly. The interim Stay, if any also stands vacated.
C. File be consigned to the record room.
(Dr. J.R. Chauhan)
Presiding Officer
Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad
Classifi cation No. of Exh.
[Ambadas] (SA No. 18/2025) Page 1 of 1
Sunita Kailas Shelke and four Ors.
Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd.
J.R. Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
