The Division Bench dismissed the application in default for non-prosecution, noting that the applicant failed to appear despite repeated calls and has not pursued the case since June 18, 2025.
Application dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sLlL79l2O2s
YOGESH VS JM FINANCIAL ASSETRECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED(ERSTWHILE JMFINANCIAL ASSET RECONSTRUCTTON COMPANYPRTVATE LTMTTED)
30.10.2025
Item no. 3
Present: None.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencing/hybrid Mode.
Despite repeated calls, no oneappearedon behalf of the applicant. It appears that the applicantsare not interestedin pursuing the case since, 18.06.2025. Hence,the present SA is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
File be consigned to records.
S-\ (SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
A
Yogesh
JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Limited
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
