Registry order allowing adjournment of SA No. 177/2024 for the respondent to file reply/vakalatnama due to applicant's failure to file service affidavit.
Case adjourned to 19th December 2025 for filing vakalatnama/reply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD ORDER SHEET
Date: 03rd September, 2025. Sr. No. 40 SA No. 177/2024
| Classi ficatio |
No. of Exh. |
|
|---|---|---|
| Ms Shrikant Mens Parlour Applicant Versus S.M.F.G. India Home Finance Ltd. Defendants |
||
| None for applicant. Mr. R S Gangaklhedkar – Advocate for respondent bank. 1. No service affidavit/compliance pursis has been filed by applicant. |
||
| 2. In this matter the counsel for respondent submits that he has received copy of SA. 3. The counsel for respondent seeks one more opportunity for filing vakalatnama/reply and requested for short adjournment, request allowed. Case is therefore adj. for filingvakalatnama/replystand over to 19th**December, 2025,**as a last opportunity. |
||
(Aradhana Nikam) Asst. Registrar, Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad. |
(RS) Page no. 1 of 1
Ms Shrikant Mens Parlour
S.M.F.G. India Home Finance Ltd.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
