The Applicant challenged a notice under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act. The Respondent bank withdrew the notice via an email dated 23.06.2025. The Tribunal disposed of the matter following the withdrawal.
The notice under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act was withdrawn by the Respondent Bank, resulting in the disposal of the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/176/2025 SHAGUN SHEIKH Vs STATE BANK OF INDIA
24.06.2025 Item No.4
Present: Sh. Shailender Kashyap, Counsel for the Applicant. Sh.Vivek Verma, Counsel for the respondent bank.
Mr.Verma has filed vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent bank. On instructions from the bank, Mr.Verma has made a statement at the Bar that the bank has withdrawn the notice under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act. He has also place on the record a copy of email, dated 23.06.2025 by the bank. In view of this, the present SA stands disposed of .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shagun Sheikh
State Bank of India
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
