The application regarding regularization of an account was disposed of because the applicant had no information on the status after the bank's counsel stated regularization.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/175/2025 SARABJEET KAUR Vs ICICI BANK LIMITED
24.07.2025 Item No.26
Present: Mr. Shivamdeep Dwivedi, proxy Counsel for Mr. Lovish, Counsel for the Applicant. Mr. Manav Singal, proxy Counsel for Mr. Rahul Garg, Counsel for respondent bank.
Counsel for the bank states that the account has since been regularized. Whereas, counsel for the applicant states that he does not have any information. In view of this, SA stands disposed of.
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
SABJEET KAUR
ICICI BANK LIMITED
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
