The High Court dismissed Special Appeal No. 175 of 2025 due to the absence of representation from the Applicants, finding they were not interested in pursuing the matter. Pending IAs are also disposed.
Special Appeal No. 175 of 2025 stands dismissed and disposed of; Pending IAs, if any, disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 27.06.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.175 of 2025 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| None for the Applicants. |
|||
| Mr Prashant Shinde i/b M/s. A.B. | |||
| Shinde & Co., Advocate for Respondent. |
|||
| Order-sheet dated 28.04.2025 shows that no representation was made by the |
|||
| Applicants. Even today, no |
|||
| representation is made by the Applicants either personally or through the Advocate or through VC. Prima facie, it appears that the Applicants are not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, S.A. No.175 of 2025 stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly. Pending IAs, if any, stand disposed of. |
|||
| rst – 26 | File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Applicants
Respondent
P.O.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
