The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the applicant's special application because the underlying account had been settled between the parties, resulting in the disposal of the matter without any adversarial hearing.
The special application was disposed of due to the settlement of the account.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/172/2025 SUKHMANDER SINGH Vs AXIS BANK
27.11.2025 Item No.23
Present: None for the Applicant. Mr. Manav Singal, Counsel for respondent bank.
Mr. Singal, states that the account has since been settled. In view of this, SA stands disposed of .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
Sukmander Singh
Axis Bank
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
