Securitization application disposed as infructuous due to respondent bank withdrawing notice under Section 13(2).
Securitization application disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 10
Case No. SA/17/2025
CHIRANJI LAL SAINI Vs BAID FINSERV LIMITED
Date: 09.04.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
Shri Apoorv Mathur, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Sandeep Bansiwal, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Counsel for the respondent bank submits that they withdrew notice under Section 13(2).
In view of the above, this Securitization Application stands disposed of as infractuous.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer
Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Chiranjee Lal Saini
Baid Finserv Limited
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
