The Debts Recovery Tribunal disposed of the Sahara order against the applicant bank because the SARFAESI notices were withdrawn by the bank.
Sahara order disposed of due to withdrawal of SARFAESI notices by the bank.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/162/2025 MS MAA BAGLAMUKHI JEWELERS AND ORS Vs HIMACHAL PRADESH GRAMIN BANK
04.08.2025
Item No.10
Present: Mr. Satish Jaswal, Counsel for the Applicant. Mr. R.K. Bansal, Counsel for respondent bank.
Mr. Bansal, states that the bank has withdrawn the
SARFAESI notices. In view of this, SA stands disposed of .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
MS MAA BAGLAMUKHI JEWELERS AND ORS
HIMACHAL PRADESH GRAMIN BANK
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
