Anita Kumari v. Union Bank of India
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/162/2024 ANITA KUMARI Vs UNION BANK OF INDIA
21.03.2025 Item No.6
Present: Mr. Gautam Bhardwaj, Counsel for the Applicant. Mr. RK Bansal, Counsel for respondent bank.
Counsel for the applicant has made a statement at the Bar that the account has since been settled and he does not want to pursue the present SA and the same is hereby dismissed as withdrawn.
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Anita Kumari
- respondent
Union Bank of India
Coram
A S Narang
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court