which Paween Kumar (Respondent No.4) had created in respect of the nat in favor of the Bank for the sum which was due in the flat amount. 6. It is admitted by the counsel for the Bank that the Bank had registered the security interest with the CERSAI Portal on 13.01.2025 and prior to that on 04.01.2025 it had issued the notice under Section 13(4). Since. there was no CERS Al Registration on the date Bank issued the notice under Section 13(4), 1 am of the considered view, that Bank is not entitled to enforce the same in respect of the loan of Rs.32.00 Lacs which it had given to Parveen Kumar (Respondent No.4) for purchasing the plot. It is admitted as on date a sum of Rs.203/- is due in the loan account of flat. In case Parveen Kumar (Respondent No.4) makes the payment of Rs.203/-, the Respondent Bank would release the title deeds to Parveen Kumar (Respondent No.4). Counsel for Parveen Kumar (Respondent No.4) is present and he admits that Parveen Kumar (Respondent No.4) has executed the sale-deed in respect of the flat in favor of the Applicant in the year 2022 and there is no dispute between them. Accordingly, SA is allowed. All the pending IAs, if any, are also stand disposed of accordingly.
