The applicant failed to appear in the third pass hearing. The tribunal treated the absence as a sign of lack of interest and dismissed the application in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/151/2025 HARJIT KUMAR AND ANOTHER Vs PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
19.12.2025 Item No.10
Present: None for the Applicant. Sh.Arvind Rajotia, Counsel for respondent bank.
This is third pass over since morning. Nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 03:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Harjit Kumar and Another
Punjab National Bank
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
